Bill Gates' Vaccination Strategy -

Bill Gates—who doesn’t know that name? With regard to the past corona crisis, we encountered it quite often. When you know Gates only as a software salesman, his prominence seems out of place. Perhaps it becomes a little less strange when you know that Bill Gates is primarily an investor these days and has large interests in the vaccine industry, among others. For those who want to know what role this man played in the crisis, here is a succinct analysis of his vaccination strategy.

By C.F. van der Horst
5 September 2020, updated 9 September 2022

We take you back to the beginning of the corona crisis in 2020, to the entities that shaped international policy—and perhaps still are. In a nutshell, these were:

The World Health Organization (WHO)
The epidemiological computer models from the Imperial College London and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington in Seattle
The media.

The WHO declared the corona influenza COVID-19 a pandemic and, as a supranational organization, demanded solidarity from all countries that had joined the WHO. The computer models, with their predictions of millions of deaths, caused great unrest among government leaders and others, and the media embellished the doomsday scenarios, literally day and night.

What do these factors have in common? Sponsorship by Bill Gates through his Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF).

Bill Gates bought the World Health Organization (WHO) years ago. Even before former President Trump announced that the U.S. would withdraw as a sponsor of WHO, Bill Gates, through the BMGF and his 4 billion dollars stake in the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI Alliance), was WHO’s largest donor. In 2020, Germany became the major sponsor for the 2020-2021 program budget with the BMGF & GAVI combination in a good second place, well ahead of England in place three and the US in four. One would almost begin to think of changing the name of this supranational institution. With the influence Gates has bought himself, the Gates Health Organization, or health according to the ideas of a shrewd investor, would be a better and fairer designation.

From the beginning, the WHO insisted on testing, drugs, and vaccination. The organization did not utter a single word about lifestyle and nutrition as a way to strengthen the immune system. Such preventive measures and the focus on a strong immune system would be more obvious than anything else, but this patentless and therefore unprofitable approach was (and still is) completely ignored. This makes it clear that for-profit interests are at stake.

In the corona crisis, epidemiological computer models from two renowned universities played a major role. Both computer models came up with doomsday scenarios of millions of deaths. Because the media published them widely, they caused great alarm among government leaders and members of parliament. The impact on government policies was enormous and resulted in draconian measures that crippled economic and social life.

The two universities in question are Imperial College in London and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington in Seattle. And what is the role of Bill Gates? Both institutions have received huge sums of money from the BMGF: more than 240 million dollars for the Imperial College and 279 million dollars for IHME.

The projections of both universities turned out to be completely wrong.

It is worth mentioning that the Oxford University computer model that had a very different, much milder prognosis was all but ignored. Why do the media give ample coverage to one computer model and barely to another? What behind-the-scenes factor played a role here?

Many people do not know that Bill Gates also “donates” large sums of money to commercial media companies. This is a highly unusual practice in the world of foundations such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Commercial companies are supposed to keep their own pants up, and such a “donation” cannot be interpreted in any other way as buying influence.

Here is a sample from the donation box: two operating companies of Dutch media company Endemol have received financial support from Bill Gates, with a donation of nearly 350,000 dollars and another of more than 480,000 dollars, respectively. In America, Gates sponsors/sponsored the radio and TV stations ABC, NPR and PBS, in England The Guardian, The Daily Telegraph and the BBC, in Germany Die Zeit and Der Spiegel and in France Le Monde. The list goes on and on.

Through this sponsorship, Gates largely determines what we read, hear, and see in the press. Who pays the piper calls the tune.

Judges in ancient times used the question, “Cui bono?” or “Who benefits?” The answer seems obvious, because all the news coverage is pushing for the vaccine. Until the vaccine arrives, we would not be able to go back to normal. A global vaccine makes billions of dollars/euros. And money seems to play an important role because the inexpensive solution (the combination of the old malaria drug hydroxychloroquine, zinc and the antibiotic azithromycin) with which Dutch GP Rob Elens cured his patients was banned for use in primary care (general practitioners) with few valid arguments.

You can often better understand seemingly strange situations if you follow the flow of money to its source. As has been seen before in history, there is the phenomenon of strategic philanthropy. It has been described in detail in the book Deadly Lies: How Doctors and Patients Are Deceived. It explains why it is that medical education focuses on pharmacy and excludes older and natural medicine. It does not end there, however, because Bill Gates is a textbook example of a strategic philanthropist.

Gates makes targeted “donations” (read: investments), to reap the benefits later. His “donations,” however, come with conditions. The money was to be used only in furtherance of the goals of the BMGF, particularly those of global vaccination. Were it really a gift, the recipient may of course do with it what he will, but that is not the case with these “donations.” How would you feel if you were given money on your birthday and told what you can and cannot use it for?

To better understand the concept of strategic philanthropy, consider Bill Gates’ interests in the corona crisis.

“Deadly Lies. How Doctors and Patients Are Deceived” describes the conflicts of interest of government officials and scientists, the mass marketing of the pharmaceutical industry, and the lies used to deceive both physicians and you.

Bill Gates is a shrewd software trader who pushed for a monopoly with Microsoft. He was publicly taken to task for that in 1999. Immediately after the whistle was blown on him in the said antitrust case, he founded the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. It seems that with this foundation he is now succeeding in getting the monopoly he could not manage with his software company. After all, behind the scenes, Gates had a defining role in global corona policy.

It is clearly not altruism that drives him. Bill Gates has shares in more than nine major pharmaceutical companies. He also has interests in major vaccine coalitions, the aforementioned GAVI Alliance and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI). These alliances are nothing more or less than front groups for the pharmaceutical vaccine industry. For example, through CEPI, the BMGF sponsors the pharmaceutical company Moderna, which is developing experimental RNA vaccines.

The Seattle computer guy thus has a thick hand in all aspects of the corona crisis: the umbrella, supranational advisory organization WHO, universities with fearsome computer models, vaccine front groups, the media, and the industry that is supposed to supply the vaccine that the official message says is so necessary. As shown below, he is influential on social media as well.

This broad combination comes even more peculiar when you know that Gates was also the major sponsor and pacesetter—along with Johns Hopkins University, also sponsored by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation—behind Event 201. Event 201 was the dress rehearsal for the corona crisis that took place in October 2019.

And did you know that the German and Dutch governmental public health institutes (the Robert Koch Institute and the RIVM, respectively) received funds from the BMGF?

On American policy, Bill Gates is also making his mark. The White House spokesman at the time of the corona crisis was the controversial Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Since 2011, Fauci has been committed to a global vaccine program, the Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP). This program is an initiative of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Fauci is a member of the so-called Leadership Council of the GVAP and is in regular contact with Bill Gates.

Fake news versus authoritative news_YouTube policy@2x

YouTube‘s policy: news from unofficial sources is considered “fake news” and is suppressed. The “official” sources are pushed forward and emphasized.

With regard to social media, Bill Gates uses his influence to neutralize people who pose a threat to his plans. Censorship is the right word for it. Dissenters and especially those who are critical of vaccination would be unscientific. In an interview, Gates complained that he was at the center of “conspiracy theories.” He worried about the impact of those theories, especially for creating a reluctance to vaccinate. He felt that social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube should do something about this and outright called for censoring “the spread of what I [BG] consider crazy ideas.”

The word “conspiracy theories” used by Gates is a derogatory tool to label dissenters as unreliable sources beforehand. Since Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook’s chief boss, considers him a mentor, Gates also has the right contacts to bring about that censorship.

People who do not go along with the official story, even if they are doctors who come up with well-reasoned arguments, are, in his view, “conspiracy thinkers.” The call for censorship led to several videos being removed from YouTube.

Although the term “conspiracy theories” is older, it was popularized by the CIA. This US intelligence community did not know how to deal with people who questioned the official reading of the Warren Report on the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Besides the claim about Lee Harvey Oswald being the single gunman, the so-called magic bullet described in the report raised the most questions.

According to the official reading, this would be a miracle that has not occurred since the year 33 of this era. The magic bullet would have struck both President John Kennedy and Texas Governor John Connally sitting slightly diagonally in front of him. If the Warren Report’s conclusion were correct, this projectile passed through 15 layers of clothing, seven layers of skin, and about 38 cm of muscle tissue, struck the knot of a tie, removed 10 cm of rib, and shattered a radius bone. Nevertheless, the copper nose and sleeve remained completely intact. Moreover, the bullet would have changed direction in mid-air. Deus ex machina.

The “magic bullet” that killed JFK and wounded Governor Connally. The bullet miraculously changed direction in mid-air and remained completely intact.

People who took issue with the Warren Report’s conclusion and sought another explanation for the murder were dismissed as “conspiracy theorists” and cast in a bad light. Just as during the corona crisis dissenting doctors or scientists were dismissed as “liars, cheaters and conspiracy theorists.”

In terms of diseases, the corona flu—as happens in every flu season—is long gone. However, the government measures remained in place for a long time, thereby perpetuating another crisis of its own making: an economic and human rights crisis. A large international counter-movement emerged with demonstrations in major cities. However, the respective governments turned a deaf ear to the voice of their constituents.

If you try with all your might to move an object and it does not move, it may be useful to see who on the other side is pushing back. In this case, everything points toward Bill Gates’ dollars.